![]() ![]() On my machine, Tupe has now replaced just about every other saturator/analogifier/tape-simulator/vintage-vibe-injector I have. Its brilliant EQ-Emphasis tandem is a design of unparallelled "near-the-red-or-into-the-red" character-shaping power. With Tupe, on the other hand, you can actually do something that *does* make a difference (as small or as big a difference as you like or need) and be *very* precise with it too. Unless you wanna go for a caricature of what you imagine ‘tape’ is supposed to sound like, of course. This tape-simulation fad, and the beneficial impact these type of plugins are supposed to have on your sound is often a bit silly (and self-delusional), in my opinion. by Steve Carter on Tue 6:51 pm Steve Carter Posts: 1647 Offline Posts : Joined : 344 5 minute song, about 20 tracks predominently audio. Tape Echoes delivers all the dirt you’ve ever wanted from a tape delay in one superbly modeled native plug-in. If I were to do a blind-test, I guarantee the results would prove to be a rude awakening, and very sobering. Tape Echoes hearkens back to this legacy and the spirit of Softube giant Tape. And I doubt I ever will again.Īlso: with too many of these tape simulators, there’s rather a lot of fooling-yourself-that-you-can-hear-a-meaningful-difference, I find. Granted, that's on an older Mac.) Used them a few times since I bought two of them, but that was weeks ago. (If I load two instances in the same session, there’s hardly any computing power left to run something else too. ![]() The IK’s are pretty good, but not worth the massive CPU sacrifice, in my opinion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |